"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/31/2015 at 20:29 • Filed to: None
7
12|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
08/31/2015 at 20:29 • Filed to: None | 7
| 12 |
This reminds me a bit of the biker group in New York, only instead of sports bikes and a Range Rover, it’s been San Francisco-ified with cyclists and a Zipcar Subaru. I don’t care who technically hit who here. Speaking as a cyclist and a motorist, I say this: if it were me, the second a group of people surround my car and start beating on it and yelling threatening things, I am leaving that scene by any means necessary, so try not to be in front of my car when I do.
K-Roll-PorscheTamer
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 20:33 |
|
But think of all the offenses you’ll be causing to be reported on the news. The politically correct debates, the presidential election will go into disarray!!
Raptor Jesus have mercy on your soul...(o_o)
Richtofen, Baron von Pickup
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 20:34 |
|
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. I don’t find fault with the Subaru driver.
HammerheadFistpunch
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 20:39 |
|
Yeah I see a drunk / stupid cyclist riding into oncoming traffic and playing moral high ground chicken and losing then turning feral
DoYouEvenShift
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 20:54 |
|
Rule of thumb is, get out of the way of the vehicle with more wheels than you.
I dont screw around with semis and dump trucks in my car. So I expect others to do the same to me.
Shark-Attack
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 20:59 |
|
Trust me, you are not the only one.
TheRealBicycleBuck
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 21:14 |
|
As a cyclist, I wholly approve of these dumbasses getting their bikes run over. Let’s count the offenses: 1. Turning left in a no-turning zone. 2. Riding the wrong way down the street. 3. Failure to yield. 4. Assault. 5. Damage to private property.
If you are going to be a cyclist on the road, follow the laws. They are there for your safety as well as the safety of others. I really hesitate to call these guys cyclists. They are really just dumbasses on bicycles.
jvirgs drives a Subaru
> TheRealBicycleBuck
08/31/2015 at 21:35 |
|
And if anything, the dumbass on the bike ran into the car.
Side note: I was home a couple of weeks ago and was following a cyclist through a neighborhood. He was riding in the middle of the lane but since it was down hill he was meeting the 25 mph speed limit so I didn’t really care. He then proceeded to blow through a 4-way stop at speed while passing a car traveling in the same direction on the left. He was extremely lucky that the car was not turning left at that moment because he would have went flying.
Cyclists/motorcyclists want respect on the road but then go and pull stupid shit like this.....
Berang
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 21:47 |
|
Not cyclists, just douche-tankers. Looks like Critical Mass - most cyclists hate these guys with an all consuming passion. Go on a cycling forum and see how many threads there are of cyclists complaining about these “events” and you’ll get an idea.
This particular video reminds me of this:
Money Hustard
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 22:33 |
|
Why would the bikers post this? They come off like idiots.
wafflesnfalafel
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
08/31/2015 at 23:12 |
|
There are consequences to threatening harm to other people - notably you could end up squashed by a Subaru. All they have successfully done is completely compromised any credibility they might have had.
DipodomysDeserti
> HammerheadFistpunch
09/01/2015 at 01:18 |
|
They had pretty good balance for being drunk. I think they were just dickheads rather than some sort of drunk moralists.
|
HammerheadFistpunch
> DipodomysDeserti
09/01/2015 at 10:22 |
|
So the other one then